Today, I read something interesting in the Urbanophile (an excellent blog if you've never read it).
A taste:
Generally speaking, if you're in the market to buy a "thing," (whether that "thing" is a cheeseburger or a day's worth of work) and you can't find a willing seller, you offer more. This is not a complicated theory, yet it seems to be lost on our intrepid "job creators" these days.Employers are having trouble finding workers. A big problem is pay, but not many employers plan to add higher wage jobs.The survey asked how firms dealt with positions they couldn’t fill. Here were the results:
- 55% left unfilled until a candidate was found
- 18% assigned duties internally to other workers
- 11% hired an underqualified candidate
- 16% other
Notice what’s missing from this list: raising the wage on offer in order to attract qualified applicants. Maybe some of that is included in “other” but it’s clearly a small amount.
Another quote:
The real question that needs to be asked is why these firms aren’t offering a market clearing wage.
If they can’t afford to pay the going rate, then these firms don’t have a skills gap problem, they have a business model problem. The problem is with the companies, not the workforce.I would agree. Again, I can't help but note the irony of businesses simultaneously demanding that the government shrink in size (presumably in order to shrink their tax obligations) AND train their workers for them. Remember, these are the same types that like to talk about how government is the "problem" and not the "solution." I suppose if the problem is an untrained workforce, it must be the government's fault.
Here is the money line:
It’s not government’s job to underwrite a highly skilled but poorly paid workforce.Happy Taco Tuesday!
I would agree with your assessment generally , but I thought I'd tell you IU Health decided to offer their new grad respiratory therapists $23.00 per hour right out of school . While I know the reason is not really what they SAY it is , that " we are the lowest paid hospital in the city " FALSE ( I know so because my husband works at a competing hospital , and I've worked several hospitals PRN over the years ) I'm suspecting that they had to do this to attract new grads as they failed to attract the numbers that they had attracted in the past .... mainly because their reputation for poor treatment of their employees precedes them .... due to Dan Evans assinine philosophy for using the stick rather than the carrot on the peons i.e. worker bees who actually keep the ship afloat ... thankfully he is gone ... " retired " or if you believe all the doctors " asked to leave" THANK YOU LORD !
ReplyDeleteBut yes if a business is desperate they should and in some cases do offer more .